F1 crew 2008 season thread
#3351
Posted 16 October 2008 - 03:17 AM
http://www.formula1....r/2008/323.html
#3352
Posted 16 October 2008 - 04:14 AM
didn't honda have the most powerful engine in 2006?just a temporary unfreeze for renault, toyo and honda ONLY.
#3354
Posted 16 October 2008 - 04:21 AM
They also had a good car in 06.didn't honda have the most powerful engine in 2006?
Apparently, they threw all that away for 07.
#3355
Posted 16 October 2008 - 05:55 AM
didn't honda have the most powerful engine in 2006?
I miss Honda's Suzuka special engines... 1000hp 1 shot engine
#3356
Posted 16 October 2008 - 06:22 AM
Maybe they'll bring it back next year.I miss Honda's Suzuka special engines... 1000hp 1 shot engine
#3357
Posted 16 October 2008 - 07:01 AM
how is that supposed to be fair?just a temporary unfreeze for renault, toyo and honda ONLY.
#3358
Posted 16 October 2008 - 07:18 AM
how is that supposed to be fair?
how is being stuck with a less powerful engine and not being able to do anything with it for a few more years fair?
I think they should either get rid of the freeze or just impose an hp limit like in wrc
the current plan is pretty dumb
#3359
Posted 16 October 2008 - 08:28 AM
#3360
Posted 16 October 2008 - 09:46 AM
they can introduce "reliability related evolutions" just like everyone elsehow is being stuck with a less powerful engine and not being able to do anything with it for a few more years fair?
I think they should either get rid of the freeze or just impose an hp limit like in wrc
the current plan is pretty dumb
if they're going to unfreeze, then it should be done for everyone
#3361
Posted 16 October 2008 - 12:03 PM
they should fucking get rid of it, F1 WILL ALWAYS FIND WAYS TO SPEND MONEY
this man speaks da troof
#3362
Posted 16 October 2008 - 12:03 PM
just a temporary unfreeze for renault, toyo and honda ONLY.
yeah, i didnt catch this at all... how crazy is that...
#3363
Posted 16 October 2008 - 03:30 PM
I don't want Lewis to win the title this year...
where is Sato's kamikaze moves when you need it
#3366
Posted 16 October 2008 - 03:52 PM
Reckless Hamilton should now take a history lesson in respect
There are signs that Lewis Hamilton has inherited from his predecessors the view that any tactic justifies victory
They grew up racing go-karts as though they were dodgems. Now they race 750-horsepower cars with survival cells so strong that you could probably drive one off the rim of the Grand Canyon and live to tell the tale. No wonder today's formula one drivers don't play by the old rules, as those of us who rose before dawn on Sunday saw during the course of an absorbing but, in the end, dismaying telecast from the foothills of Mount Fuji.
Manoeuvres that could be politely described as over-aggressive by Lewis Hamilton and Felipe Massa, rivals for this year's drivers' title, shaped the outcome of the race and provoked the subsequent accusations and recriminations. Both were penalised by the race stewards. Deeper down, however, the real blame lies with those who allowed their predecessors to adapt motor racing's etiquette in order to incorporate the kind of tactics that drivers of earlier eras would have seen as tantamount to attempted murder.
There is no difficulty in identifying those predecessors. Ayrton Senna's belief in his own near-divinity and Michael Schumacher's sheer unscrupulousness set an example to Hamilton and Massa as surely as Bach begat Beethoven and Cézanne begat Picasso. What we are seeing now is the inevitable consequence of kowtowing to the standing they had established in the grand prix circus.
There is certainly something of Senna about Hamilton and, sadly, it is not confined to a driving talent that approaches genius. When the Brazilian was once put on the spot over a misdemeanour on the track, he replied: "But I am Senna." Hamilton appears to have acquired a similar sense of bulletproof entitlement, a conviction that goes far beyond the normal boundaries of self-confidence and into a realm where the rest of the human race plays only a supporting role.
From what we know of him, Hamilton does not share Senna's propensity for seeing his role in a near-mystical light. He prefers to keep his wheels on the ground, with an attitude more reminiscent of that displayed by Schumacher during the German's period of total dominance. There are signs that Hamilton inherited from both men the view that any tactic, from the borderline unchivalrous to the downright illegitimate, justifies victory, for the simple reason that, according to their logic, it confirms the natural order of things.
When Robert Kubica criticised Hamilton's approach last week, he was probably not expecting to see such instant and vivid evidence in support of his words. "There are differences of philosophies," the Polish driver said. "Either you drive hard but fair or you are overconfident." He went on to make a specific criticism of the English driver's tactics at Monza last month. Hamilton rejected the accusation, but on Sunday his behaviour as he refused to accept the consequences of a poor start showed that Kubica's comments were not merely an example of the usual mind games.
While he nurses his hope that the next two races will make him the next British world champion, Hamilton might like to be reminded of how the very first, Mike Hawthorn, won his crown exactly 50 years ago. Three races from the end of the season, Hawthorn was neck and neck with his great rival, Stirling Moss, as they went to the street circuit at Porto. Moss won the first Portuguese grand prix at a canter in his Vanwall, with Hawthorn heading for second place until he span on the last lap and stalled the engine, facing the way he had come. In order to restart his car, Hawthorn had to push it. Under a rule that forbids a car to travel against the direction of the circuit, the stewards promptly disqualified him. Moss, however, stood up before them to say that when Hawthorn had pushed the car, the Ferrari had been on the pavement and therefore not, strictly speaking, on the track.
As a result of Moss's testimony, Hawthorn was allowed to keep his second place and the six points which, under the scoring system of the day, went with it. A few weeks later, after races at Monza and in Casablanca, Hawthorn was named champion. He had won the title by a single point from a man who has never, from that day to this, expressed even the tiniest twinge of regret for the action that cost him so dear. Perhaps the difference is this: those men knew that every time they raced, each had the other's life in his hands.
if massa and raikkonen pull off the 1-2 this weekend and ham is 1 point up going into brazil, will he resort to this at interlagos?
or this?
#3367
Posted 16 October 2008 - 04:01 PM
interesting read..
if massa and raikkonen pull off the 1-2 this weekend and ham is 1 point up going into brazil, will he resort to this at interlagos?
all that did was make me miss suzuka
#3368
Posted 16 October 2008 - 04:39 PM
Finally someone points out that both recent 'greats' of F1 had the same flaws that people who worship them hate Hamilton for having.interesting read..
My favorite is that people who adore Senna get mad at Hamilton for being aggressive and cocky.
#3369
Posted 16 October 2008 - 05:06 PM
Finally someone points out that both recent 'greats' of F1 had the same flaws that people who worship them hate Hamilton for having.
My favorite is that people who adore Senna get mad at Hamilton for being aggressive and cocky.
Senna would not be nearly as popular if he didnt die...
#3370
Posted 16 October 2008 - 05:13 PM
but he probably was also more humble in his first and 2nd year in f1...Senna would not be nearly as popular if he didnt die...
hamilton would be better off if he would just shut up and drive. or at least get mmbly like kimi.. but he's too much of a puppet to the media that he'll bite whatever bait they throw at him.
#3371
Posted 16 October 2008 - 05:32 PM
Not if he'd been in a position to win.but he probably was also more humble in his first and 2nd year in f1...
#3372
Posted 16 October 2008 - 06:13 PM
#3373
Posted 16 October 2008 - 11:10 PM
interesting read..
if massa and raikkonen pull off the 1-2 this weekend and ham is 1 point up going into brazil, will he resort to this at interlagos?
KLYC1lnVAic
or this?
dfby7GaMXm
I can't see the logic to this situation. Firstly Prost is in front and Senna brakes late with minimal chance of making the corner, but JV did the same thing in Jerez to Schumacher. Yet, Schumacher gets blamed for the situation. Likewise for Adelaide, just because Schumacher was a slower car - it doesnt not give him the right to block Damon, he moved once and that was it. He took the racing line and Damon punted him.
Still to this day I dont understand how Schumacher was blamed for both of those incidents.
#3374
Posted 17 October 2008 - 12:06 AM
I can't see the logic to this situation. Firstly Prost is in front and Senna brakes late with minimal chance of making the corner, but JV did the same thing in Jerez to Schumacher. Yet, Schumacher gets blamed for the situation. Likewise for Adelaide, just because Schumacher was a slower car - it doesnt not give him the right to block Damon, he moved once and that was it. He took the racing line and Damon punted him.
Still to this day I dont understand how Schumacher was blamed for both of those incidents.
to me, it looked clear that schumi tried to turn into JV even thought he could see he was there. JV made the corner, its not like he was sliding out of his line.
#3375
Posted 17 October 2008 - 12:37 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












