Jump to content

*2010 Grand Prix of Turkey~Istanbul/Constantinople/Istanbul/Constantinople/Istanbul/Constantinople~*


  • Please log in to reply
102 replies to this topic

#76 Redliner

Redliner

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,169 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the kerbs

Posted 30 May 2010 - 07:11 PM

That was 50/50 to me. As team-mates SOMEONE should've backed off; having said that, I wouldn't have backed off either. Webber didn't give Vettel any room, Vettel had the nose ahead, but was off the racing line. 3 ways could've come about this: Vettel backs off because he's not on the racing line. Webber backs off because Vettel had his nose ahead...both are fair moves. Of course, the 3rd would be to take each other out - and they chose the 3rd. :eek3:

Man what a race...holy crap, this just turned up the wick for the next race! :bowdown:

#77 DrDickAction

DrDickAction

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,867 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oakland, CA

Posted 30 May 2010 - 07:13 PM

I'd blame Vettel a bit more as he was going for the pass, and he was the one moving over, but Webber could have perhaps given a little more space seeing that it was his team mate

but then if Vettel wasn't his team mate then there's no reason at all for Webber to move over.

so for me 75% Vettel's fault

Agreed, even in light of the fuel saving revelation.

#78 _R_

_R_

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,849 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 May 2010 - 07:37 PM

what a boring race...
besides the vettle/webber thing 41 laps into the race, absolutely nothing happened...
i was looking forward to the rain, and i hate rain races if that tell you anything...

#79 Shi

Shi

    Administrator

  • F1 Crew Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,794 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Gatos, CA
  • Interests:Vehicle dynamics, trackdays, motorsports

Posted 30 May 2010 - 08:03 PM

what a boring race...
besides the vettle/webber thing 41 laps into the race, absolutely nothing happened...
i was looking forward to the rain, and i hate rain races if that tell you anything...

I thought this race actually had a decent amount of tension and passing :bowdown:

#80 SeaMack99

SeaMack99

    Formula 3

  • F1 Crew Member
  • PipPip
  • 118 posts

Posted 30 May 2010 - 08:14 PM

I thought this race actually had a decent amount of tension and passing :bowdown:


wrrd, it was pretty exciting from the front all the way to the back with Ferrari doing battle with Renault

#81 Redliner

Redliner

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,169 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the kerbs

Posted 30 May 2010 - 08:28 PM

I thought this race actually had a decent amount of tension and passing :bowdown:


:eek3:

I thought it was an awesome race from beginning to end and it's nice to see a good dry race, where things don't become exciting only because of the rain.

#82 TimzSI

TimzSI

    GP2

  • F1 Crew Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 482 posts

Posted 31 May 2010 - 12:47 AM

This race was crazy tense. You could feel it between teammates and between teams. And ultimately Vettel showed a crack when the other three contenders managed to hold it together. This shit is just getting started, and that's what Turkey was all about; finally setting the scene and actors for the title fight about to unfold. Mclarens race pace is legitimate, and fuel mileage not withstanding they need to be getting closer in quali.

#83 _R_

_R_

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,849 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 May 2010 - 03:19 AM

i must've been watching a different race... this is what i saw...
top4 drivers parading around for 41 laps till the vettel/webber incident then the lewis/button passing the next lap
shumi and nico running around in the next spots
kubica/massa doing nothing
and alonso being held up by koby till the pits and ending up in 8th...

so the top 8 drivers did nothing for me...

#84 doublemeat

doublemeat

    Formula 3

  • F1 Crew Member
  • PipPip
  • 177 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Antonio, Texas

Posted 31 May 2010 - 04:25 AM

Yes, the top 4 were parading, but they were all on it and no one could afford even the teensiest of bobbles for fear of losing position. They weren't just holding station and waiting for pitstops as in years past. The tension was enough that I didn't get lulled back to sleep on an early Sunday morning. I can't say that for all races...

#85 Nacho

Nacho

    WDC

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,924 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 May 2010 - 08:38 AM

IMO, arranging a pass for Seb is playing favorites in the team. They had the McLarens covered well enough, and Mark had the lead. He's been on pace lately and there was no legitimate reason to team-orders Seb around.

The McLarens seem to really be catching the RBRs, at least at tracks that have a couple bigger straights. RBR needs to get their F-duct functional or McLaren's development pace will catch and surpass them (if their luck doesn't first) in the next few races.

Also, Button taking it to Hamilton was awesome, even if Hamilton did retake it. I didn't expect those two to go at it right after the RBR incident. Jenson's really out to show that last year wasn't all the car.

#86 dgr81

dgr81

    Formula 3

  • F1 Crew Member
  • PipPip
  • 157 posts
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 31 May 2010 - 10:43 AM

i'm glad that at least Red Bull is willing to admit that it was webber's fault, which it clearly was :werd:

#87 vietlol

vietlol

    WDC

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,389 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 31 May 2010 - 12:36 PM

i'm glad that at least Red Bull is willing to admit that it was webber's fault, which it clearly was :werd:


lmao

#88 vietlol

vietlol

    WDC

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,389 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 31 May 2010 - 12:51 PM

Alonso has a thing for driving with broken wheels
Posted Image

#89 TimzSI

TimzSI

    GP2

  • F1 Crew Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 482 posts

Posted 31 May 2010 - 12:58 PM

i must've been watching a different race... this is what i saw...
top4 drivers parading around for 41 laps till the vettel/webber incident then the lewis/button passing the next lap
shumi and nico running around in the next spots
kubica/massa doing nothing
and alonso being held up by koby till the pits and ending up in 8th...

so the top 8 drivers did nothing for me...


Maybe you're just watching the wrong kind of racing. I don't know what you're looking for, but it's never going to be a multiple lead change/position change per lap type of series. It's just not. So if you don't like wet races, and you don't like a dry race like today's, you're not going to find what you're looking for in F1.

#90 Shi

Shi

    Administrator

  • F1 Crew Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,794 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Gatos, CA
  • Interests:Vehicle dynamics, trackdays, motorsports

Posted 31 May 2010 - 01:22 PM

Analysis by Autosport:

In a team whose marketing strategy was supposed to revolve around Sebastian Vettel, Mark Webber's impressive form has become an inconvenience which culminated in Turkey's crash, reckons Tony Dodgins

The great thing, we said at the start of the season, is four competitive teams all with competitive drivers. We rubbed our hands in anticipation. Might all get a bit combustible, this...

The favoured venue for aggravation had to be Ferrari – a couple of Latins in the red cars, one of whom, throughout his career, has been distinctly unimpressed whenever a team-mate got the better of him. On the surface, Red Bull looked as if it was on a more even keel. Fernando and Felipe have had a couple of minor spats but, in Turkey, war proper broke out at Red Bull.

It had to happen sooner or later. What you need to appreciate is that Red Bull is owned by Dietrich Mateschitz. He's an extremely competitive Austrian with a vision. He wants to take on the best in F1 and beat them. Which is why he's invested heavily and paid for men like Adrian Newey and Peter Prodromou, the highly-rated aerodynamicist who formed a formidable partnership with Newey at McLaren.
Mark Webber, Sebastian Vettel crash in Turkey
Mark Webber, Sebastian Vettel crash in Turkey © LAT

The other cornerstone was protege Sebastian Vettel. The Red Bull energy drink is one of the world's great marketing success stories and has made Mateschitz a billionaire. Marketing types warble on about 'brand fit' and I'm told that extreme sports and a youthful image is where it's at for Red Bull. Vettel is the perfect fit apparently.

Webber by contrast, is 33. Hardly pensionable but not the stuff of 'yoof' icons. All a load of old cobblers, I reckon. I'd be much more likely to swig a can of energy drink or tip it into whatever potent brew I'm supping if I thought it might sustain an Aussie who looks like he's been cloned from an Action Man figurines, rather than a baby-faced German fresh out of the pushchair who might have eaten too many E-numbers with his Smarties. But you get the picture. Red Bull is Vettel's team, even if Webber and Mateschitz are both keen sportsmen and they get along. He wasn't meant to win the world championship. His speed is proving a tad inconvenient right now.

Vettel, in fairness, comes across as a thoroughly decent guy albeit one who is still capable of ejecting his toys from the pram. And obviously he's darned good. But how good? Should he be given priority status in a team containing Webber?

Peter Sauber admits it was a mistake for BMW Sauber to release Vettel to go to Toro Rosso. He wasn't on a piece of Red Bull elastic and BMW could have kept him. To do so, they had to find a drive for him and pay €5m a season. Toro Rosso would not take him for a single season, insisting on two, so to keep hold of him BMW needed to cough up €10m. Their testing data was telling him that he was half a second slower than Nick Heidfeld and Robert Kubica. On reflection, Sauber thinks, that was to be expected in anyone's first year and they should have paid up. Instead, they decided to put their cash into the technical side.

Vettel developed and became confident and formidably quick but you wouldn't say he's Ayrton Senna reincarnate. Webber is certainly not up for playing second fiddle.

In Turkey, a lot of things didn't add up to a level playing, no matter what the team might say. Afterwards, Helmut Marko, Mateschitz's eyes and ears in the team, came down squarely on Vettel's side and it was obvious from the body language of the major players in the team that Webber was not flavour of the month. Which was odd considering the accident itself was solely Vettel's fault.
Helmut Marko faces the press in Turkey
Helmut Marko faces the press in Turkey © Sutton

After Vettel was outpaced by Webber in Barcelona and Monaco, the team said they had found a fault with Sebastian's car and he would have a new chassis in Turkey. Vettel was happier with it – dubbed 'Randy Mandy' – and he was quicker than Webber in Q1 and Q2 at Istanbul Park. Mark admitted he'd gone into Q3 on the back foot but he came out of it with his third successive pole.

Sebastian, after setting superior sector one and two times on his first Q3 run, was surprised by a locking wheel at Turn 12 and lost time. As soon as he started his final run he knew the problem was still there. It was later traced to a broken rear anti-roll bar mounting. So Webber enjoyed a stroke of good fortune there as Hamilton split them on the grid.

The full second deficit between Red Bull and McLaren evident in Barcelona had been all but wiped out in Turkey, albeit that the cars achieved similar lap times in very different ways. McLaren had a new, more efficient rear wing, intended for Montreal but brought forward for Istanbul, and Red Bull had been forced to make some suspension changes.

The Red Bulls, with more inherent downforce, were stunningly quick through Turn 8, while the McLarens, with their Mercedes engines and F-ducts, enjoyed a significant speed advantage all the way from there, through nine, ten and eleven and throughout the long drag into Turn 12.

What didn't stack up was why Webber, having been able to successfully defend against Hamilton's more potent McLaren in that section, had Vettel tow up so easily on that fateful lap when they came together, not having looked vulnerable at any time previously. It was the burning question for Webber post–race: is there any reason why he had a jump on you on that particular lap?

Webber: "Hmm. Maybe."

Did you come out of the previous corner a bit slower on that lap, make a mistake?

"I wasn't too slow, no. You guys need to dig more, somewhere else..."

Webber was in a difficult position. He had to be politically correct as far as the team was concerned. But the sudden speed differential, not there for the previous 25 laps, was highly suspicious. The obvious thing was different engine modes. The race had been run flat-out among the four Red Bull/McLaren drivers and consequently the fuel consumption was marginal. It looked suspiciously like Webber had been told to turn down his engine and Vettel had not. Maybe because Sebastian, running behind other cars all race, has used a mite less fuel.
Mark Webber
Mark Webber © LAT

Not the case, said Christian Horner afterwards, insisting that they were on identical engine modes. In fairness to Christian, at the time he was descended on by the media pack, he may not have known otherwise, but the story changed later – after many journalists had already filed their copy...

Marko's take, meanwhile, was this: "It was unnecessary, the whole situation. It wasn't a situation where we were racing each other, we were under enormous pressure from the McLarens. They were much faster on the straights and so we had to gain our advantage in the corners. Sebastian had to attack otherwise he would have been overtaken by Hamilton. It would have been completely different if the McLarens had been 10 seconds behind, but that wasn't the case."

So the obvious question was whether the team had put through a call to Mark to let Sebastian through?

There followed a suspiciously long pause from Marko. "Obviously there was not the right communication going on..." he said, somewhat enigmatically. There was more to this than met the eye.

Webber, obviously, was not acting like a man intending to let his team-mate through. Faced with Vettel up his inside, he behaved as any racing driver would. He gave him a car's width and no more, holding him on the dirty part of the track to force him to take a take a tight line into T12 and hopefully give Mark the chance to re-pass on the run down to Turn 1 – precisely as Hamilton did to Button when Jenson passed him – by dint of more effective braking on the racing line and a better exit from the last complex of corners.

Why should Webber behave any differently with Vettel, a man with whom he shared the world championship lead? Any accusation from the team that he did anything wrong can only mean that he shouldn't have been racing. Which, of course, we all hope is not the case...

Vettel, obviously, did not wish to brake on the dirt and was impatient to move Webber across so that he could take the optimum line. The problem was, he hadn't cleared Webber's car and he moved too soon. It was cack-handed at best. Vettel paid the price by recording a non-score while Webber salvaged 15 points which, overall, was a just outcome.

Where was Marko coming from? It was fine because Vettel was under pressure from Hamilton? What? Of course he was, it was a motor race, but he hadn't succumbed at any point since the pitstops 25 laps previously, so what was the panic now? Webber admitted that he wasn't quite as comfortable on the prime tyre but his lap times weren't exactly slow. It seemed odd to suddenly compromise the bloke who'd led the race from the start.

Webber, you feel, wouldn't have been impressed by Vettel being called first for a tyre stop either. You could defend that on the grounds that the team got Sebastian ahead of Hamilton but you might not have been too thrilled if you'd been the guy leading...

Neither did Webber seem particularly impressed by his stop and reckoned he was fortunate that McLaren didn't have a smooth one with Hamilton either.
Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, Turkish GP
Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, Turkish GP © Sutton

"We put fuel in, I think, at the pitstop..." he said drily. "My guys weren't quick and I thought 'Lewis's guys are also having a bit of a break...'

Marko had obviously been on the phone to Mateschitz after the contretemps and everyone wanted to know team owner's response.

"He's not amused," Marko confirmed. Obviously not. But it did seem a bit rich to blame Webber. Marko denied that there are divisions within the garage, with one faction backing Vettel and the other, Webber. But it's always like that when you have two quick guys in a race-winning car.

Often, as with Senna and Prost, it boils over, but I'd say that Sebastian and Mark are far more evenly matched than ever were Ayrton and Alain. Let's hope for the sake of the sport that Turkey doesn't poison the whole thing. Let's hope they put it behind them and rise to the challenge of the rest of the season as sportsmen, not marketing men. Both Webber and Formula 1 deserve that.

#91 chiuey

chiuey

    Formula 1

  • F1 Crew Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,177 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Taipei, Taiwan
  • Interests:Cycling, Running, Wakeboarding & Karts

Posted 31 May 2010 - 05:09 PM

yeah It doesn't matter how you look at it, both Webber and Vettel lost out, they only have themselves to blame for assuming anything at all. It's called a race, a competition, not a hand me everything on a silver fucking platter.

#92 _R_

_R_

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,849 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 May 2010 - 09:07 PM

I don't know what you're looking for, but it's never going to be a multiple lead change/position change per lap type of series.


I'm not expecting that... but mabye a little more than the opening handful of laps shuffle would be nice

but here's my take... what everyone is talking about anywhere on the internet about this race was the webber/vettel incident, not the actual race itself, because nothing actually happened...

now work with me on this one... imagine that the accident didn't happen and lets look at the next 1-2 laps looking at the facts that we know about...

1) webber had to turn his engine down on the "accident" lap, we'll call that lap 1
2) vettel had enough fuel to go an extra lap, so at best he would've cleared the pass and maybe a 1 second gap if that
3) lap 2 both lewis and button were told to conserve fuel... which you saw button drop back what 4 seconds by the end?

so looking at that, the only driver that could've done anything was vettel because he had 1 lap of fuel, so at most, he would've passed 1 person and the next 3 of the top 4 would've held station...

and like i said before, kubica and massa did so little in the race, i don't even remember seeing them in the race coverage... hell as far as i know, nico wasn't out there either...

#93 Redliner

Redliner

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,169 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the kerbs

Posted 01 June 2010 - 01:45 AM

I'm not expecting that... but mabye a little more than the opening handful of laps shuffle would be nice

but here's my take... what everyone is talking about anywhere on the internet about this race was the webber/vettel incident, not the actual race itself, because nothing actually happened...

now work with me on this one... imagine that the accident didn't happen and lets look at the next 1-2 laps looking at the facts that we know about...

1) webber had to turn his engine down on the "accident" lap, we'll call that lap 1
2) vettel had enough fuel to go an extra lap, so at best he would've cleared the pass and maybe a 1 second gap if that
3) lap 2 both lewis and button were told to conserve fuel... which you saw button drop back what 4 seconds by the end?

so looking at that, the only driver that could've done anything was vettel because he had 1 lap of fuel, so at most, he would've passed 1 person and the next 3 of the top 4 would've held station...

and like i said before, kubica and massa did so little in the race, i don't even remember seeing them in the race coverage... hell as far as i know, nico wasn't out there either...


But there was racing even among the McLaren duo when they turned down to save gas. But lets assume that the wreck never happened...and they had to turn down their engines to conserve fuel, they'd still have to be pushing at a pretty furious rate to keep the McLarens at bay. Plus, we saw how the McLarens started fighting for the lead so just because they turned down their engines doesn't mean the fight was off and that they'd come in all in tow without a fight. They were all pushing really hard and it really felt like this race would've come down to a fight in the very last moments, and that's what kept me on the edge of my seat.

The other guys didn't get any race coverage because the fight at the front was pretty good...

#94 Shi

Shi

    Administrator

  • F1 Crew Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,794 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Gatos, CA
  • Interests:Vehicle dynamics, trackdays, motorsports

Posted 01 June 2010 - 03:11 PM

I'm wondering whether they were really conserving fuel, or whether it was their internal code for "bring it home"

#95 Dr. Jimmmah!

Dr. Jimmmah!

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,032 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Jose, CA
  • Interests:Motorsports

Posted 01 June 2010 - 03:44 PM

I'm wondering whether they were really conserving fuel, or whether it was their internal code for "bring it home"

It seems like the safest way to tell a driver to back it off and bring it home is to tell him that he's not going to finish the race if he keeps pushing so hard. With the lead McLaren had over Webber after the crash I would not be surprised if 'conserve fuel' calls to Ham and Button were done so they would quit racing against each other.

#96 _R_

_R_

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,849 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 June 2010 - 12:59 AM

random note, talking to one of my co-workers about the race...

Mercedes told Nico to remember to use the F-duct.... now... how would that work and where is the F-duct on the merc?

#97 Dr. Jimmmah!

Dr. Jimmmah!

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,032 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Jose, CA
  • Interests:Motorsports

Posted 02 June 2010 - 02:10 AM

random note, talking to one of my co-workers about the race...

Mercedes told Nico to remember to use the F-duct.... now... how would that work and where is the F-duct on the merc?

Inlet behind the front suspension arm
http://www.autosport...php/id/13251908
http://www.autosport...php/id/13251929

How they duct the air to the rear wing elements I'm not sure w/o a good pic.

#98 Redliner

Redliner

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,169 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the kerbs

Posted 02 June 2010 - 03:55 AM

Inlet behind the front suspension arm
http://www.autosport...php/id/13251908
http://www.autosport...php/id/13251929

How they duct the air to the rear wing elements I'm not sure w/o a good pic.


that car doesn't even have a shark fin...wtf?

#99 DrDickAction

DrDickAction

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,867 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oakland, CA

Posted 02 June 2010 - 04:12 AM

that car doesn't even have a shark fin...wtf?

:wtc:

Maybe they're piping up it through the endplates :wtc:

#100 _R_

_R_

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,849 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 June 2010 - 04:13 AM

How they duct the air to the rear wing elements I'm not sure w/o a good pic.

that car doesn't even have a shark fin...wtf?


thanks for the pictures, and yeah, i still don't get how it works without the fin...




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users