F1 Crew 2009 Season Thread
#2101
Posted 21 October 2009 - 11:46 AM
but we never expected it to truly happen
#2102
Posted 21 October 2009 - 01:28 PM
Toyota will not reach a deal with Kimi Raikkonen for next season unless he drops his pay demands, team president John Howett insists.
The Cologne-based team has made Raikkonen an offer, Howett revealed last weekend in Brazil.
"He gave us back a figure that is much too high," he is quoted as saying by the Swiss publication Motorsport Aktuell. "He says he has two options, so we are going to wait.â€
It is believed that Raikkonen will receive about 25 million Euros from Ferrari for agreeing to end his 2010 contract, while his management is asking about the same amount from both McLaren and Toyota.
Nick Heidfeld was the forgotten man of the 2010 silly-season, but he could be in the running for a coveted seat at McLaren or Renault.
The Abendzeitung newspaper reports that, with Lewis Hamilton pushing hard against the prospect of sharing a team with Nico Rosberg or Kimi Raikkonen next year, Heidfeld has emerged as a candidate.
"He is the most under rated driver in Formula One," McLaren team boss Martin Whitmarsh is quoted as saying. Mercedes' Norbert Haug adds: "He brings over ten years of consistently strong performances."
Bild newspaper said Heidfeld, who debuted for Prost in 2000 and also raced with Sauber, Jordan, Williams and BMW although never winning a race, is also in the running for the Renault seat currently occupied by Romain Grosjean.
How does Sometimes-Quick Nick shake the team up less than Kimi or Nico? And
#2103
Posted 21 October 2009 - 01:41 PM
You left out the parts where his teammate moved over for him on multiple occasions.
I'd say that the whole 'teammate letting him by" had more to do with where he finished than anything under his direct control.
what do you think of some of Shummi's championship then?
#2104
Posted 21 October 2009 - 01:46 PM
50M Euro for a season
I like kimi, but damn dude, let's not go all money happy
#2105
Posted 21 October 2009 - 03:53 PM
Who the fuck takes the side of a sponsor? The whole point of success is to limit the bullshit you must waste your time on. That doesn't just go for racing.
Trying to handicap driver performance on previous years performance is difficult, there are just too many factors; tracks, cars, teams, teammates. All I am sure of is Kimi has put in some of the most exciting drives of this decade. He remains a top tier driving talent and any team that gets him is upgrading whoever he replaces.
#2106
Posted 21 October 2009 - 04:44 PM
Who the fuck takes the side of a sponsor?
i do...
brought to you by Carl's Jr.
wonder who will get that movie reference
#2107
Posted 21 October 2009 - 04:59 PM
Chiuey>Nacho
Who the fuck takes the side of a sponsor? The whole point of success is to limit the bullshit you must waste your time on. That doesn't just go for racing.
Trying to handicap driver performance on previous years performance is difficult, there are just too many factors; tracks, cars, teams, teammates. All I am sure of is Kimi has put in some of the most exciting drives of this decade. He remains a top tier driving talent and any team that gets him is upgrading whoever he replaces.
Everything on a professional level is driven by sponsorship. How the fuck would you get paid 25 mil Euros in the first place without it? And frankly, your success 3 years ago means nothing if you just got cut from the most prestigious team in Formula 1. And less than 2 weeks of sponsorship work out of 365 days a year? Give me a break.
I'm a Kimi fan, but I'm not going to sack-ride him like some of you guys are doing...
#2108
Posted 21 October 2009 - 05:04 PM
Ow My Balls!i do...
brought to you by Carl's Jr.
wonder who will get that movie reference
#2109
Posted 21 October 2009 - 05:10 PM
Who the fuck takes the side of a sponsor?
It's not the side of the sponsor, it's just reality...which makes this rumor all the more baffling.
If you're a famous actor you have to sit through press junkets; if you're an astronaut you have to talk to 5th grade science classes; if you're a fireman you have to cut fat people out of their house. Like all things, there is good and bad...dude just has to deal with the promo days in order to get the cool track days.
#2110
Posted 21 October 2009 - 05:31 PM
To be perfectly fair though... It is not in his contract to do PR next year (nevermind that he doesn't have a contract for 2010), so he is entitled to not want to do any PR. The teams are also entitled to tell him that he can go fuck himself if they feel that doing bare minimum PR work to keep sponsors happy will be better than the results that they may gain by having Kimi on board.It's not the side of the sponsor, it's just reality...which makes this rumor all the more baffling.
If you're a famous actor you have to sit through press junkets; if you're an astronaut you have to talk to 5th grade science classes; if you're a fireman you have to cut fat people out of their house. Like all things, there is good and bad...dude just has to deal with the promo days in order to get the cool track days.
Basically if Kimi says he refuses to do PR then its up to a team that feels like they can afford to not do PR for their sponsors to offer him a seat. To me that rules out McLaren and Red Bull (who are in racing solely for PR, it's not like they make a profit in F1).
#2111
Posted 21 October 2009 - 07:22 PM
i do...
brought to you by Carl's Jr.
wonder who will get that movie reference
idiocracy FTW!
#2112
Posted 21 October 2009 - 07:35 PM
To be perfectly fair though... It is not in his contract to do PR next year (nevermind that he doesn't have a contract for 2010), so he is entitled to not want to do any PR. The teams are also entitled to tell him that he can go fuck himself if they feel that doing bare minimum PR work to keep sponsors happy will be better than the results that they may gain by having Kimi on board.
Basically if Kimi says he refuses to do PR then its up to a team that feels like they can afford to not do PR for their sponsors to offer him a seat. To me that rules out McLaren and Red Bull (who are in racing solely for PR, it's not like they make a profit in F1).
I'd also throw in Toyota, they're obviously not in it to win it
#2113
Posted 21 October 2009 - 07:58 PM
Chiuey>Nacho
Who the fuck takes the side of a sponsor? The whole point of success is to limit the bullshit you must waste your time on. That doesn't just go for racing.
Trying to handicap driver performance on previous years performance is difficult, there are just too many factors; tracks, cars, teams, teammates. All I am sure of is Kimi has put in some of the most exciting drives of this decade. He remains a top tier driving talent and any team that gets him is upgrading whoever he replaces.
12 days a year isn't 'wasting your time on bullshit' when you're getting paid eight figures a year to the people that make it possible to be paid those amounts. It's called reality.
None of us get paid by companies to not give them something in return.
#2114
Posted 21 October 2009 - 08:01 PM
McLaren makes money due to their exposure in F1, but part of that is the fact that Abbey/Santander and all the other McLaren sponsors get to use the likes of Hamilton and company in their branding/advertisements. It's a big part of what they're paying for, not the tiny logo on the car.To be perfectly fair though... It is not in his contract to do PR next year (nevermind that he doesn't have a contract for 2010), so he is entitled to not want to do any PR. The teams are also entitled to tell him that he can go fuck himself if they feel that doing bare minimum PR work to keep sponsors happy will be better than the results that they may gain by having Kimi on board.
Basically if Kimi says he refuses to do PR then its up to a team that feels like they can afford to not do PR for their sponsors to offer him a seat. To me that rules out McLaren and Red Bull (who are in racing solely for PR, it's not like they make a profit in F1).
RBR is losing money and only gets brand exposure. Same with Toyota. Both have partner sponsors that will probably request that the highly paid drivers help them get their money's worth out of their sponsor contracts.
#2115
Posted 21 October 2009 - 08:04 PM
what do you think of some of Shummi's championship then?
I think he's a fantastic driver, but some of his championships weren't as stellar as others. Including the ones he won by taking out his rivals.
That said, the #1/#2 driver system obviously works well if all you're after is results. It sucks for racing though. Makes me glad that not all the teams adhere to that mindset, or we'd have 10 drivers fighting for the championship and 10 rolling chicanes.
#2116
Posted 21 October 2009 - 08:29 PM
What is less well known, though, is that the [Brawn] car is, in the words of my source, "a botch job".
It was designed for a Honda engine, and it was not until December that the team knew they would be using a Mercedes. That necessitated some pretty crude changes.
"The chassis had the back six inches cut off to fit the engine in - the sort of thing you wouldn't normally do even with a test car," says my source. "And the gearbox was in the wrong place because the crank-centre height is different. There's a massive amount of compromise in the cars."
Those compromises introduced a significant performance deficit into the Brawn car, but it raced like that all year.
That is because the lead time on making a new chassis is several months, and at the time the team would have had to make the decision - in April - the car was dominating.
By the time it had dropped off the pace, and it was obvious the team needed the extra speed that would come with a bespoke chassis and improved weight distribution, it was too late to commission a new design.
Just as incredibly the team, tight on budget, made only three chassis all year - one for Button, one for Rubens Barrichello, and a spare - when a big-money outfit such as McLaren will typically make seven or eight.
That the Brawn was so quick in the circumstances is incredibly impressive.
I had no idea that the chassis was that hacked up to put the Mercedes engine in. I knew the tranny was off, but jesus....
http://www.bbc.co.uk...y_of_brawn.html
#2117
Posted 21 October 2009 - 09:03 PM
Very
#2118
Posted 21 October 2009 - 09:06 PM
#2119
Posted 21 October 2009 - 09:26 PM
Where'd he learn how to ghetto fab like that? I thought only back-yard mechanics did that trying to fit H22 Prelude engines into a Civic or LS1s into RX7s
Veryto Brawn!
you have to start thinking...
when you take a car to the mechanic they'll charge you like $150 to change your brake pads...
these guys are "the best of the best"...
mech one: we'll just lop 6 inches off the back.... where's the hacksaw...
mech two: how much do you want to charge for the work?
mech one: well, we needed blinker fluid and muffler bearing... $2M sounds about right...
#2120
Posted 21 October 2009 - 09:34 PM
Maybe Kimi saw the flying Hammi pictures and said screw that no PR days.
#2121
Posted 21 October 2009 - 09:38 PM
Maybe Kimi saw the flying Hammi pictures and said screw that no PR days.
/discussion.
#2122
Posted 21 October 2009 - 10:51 PM
Maybe Kimi saw the flying Hammi pictures and said screw that no PR days.
What are these?
#2125
Posted 21 October 2009 - 11:52 PM
Those of you who think racing teams should be determined by sponsor wants
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











