Especially considering RBR went 1-2 at Abu Dhabi last year, they own this track on paper.Seriously though, I don't understand why they kept going on about how all is lost, etc..
8 point deficit in the new points format is like 3 points in the old format. Theres barely anything in it. In the old system if you were going into the last race down 3 points from the leader that would be considered a pretty damn good position to be in.
*2010 Grand Prix of Brasil* ~*Interlagos*~
#51
Posted 07 November 2010 - 09:40 PM
#52
Posted 07 November 2010 - 10:59 PM
RBR are very confident of a 1-2 and if it backfires on them it will be hilarious.
they need a 1-2 in a specific order depending on which driver wins...
#53
Posted 07 November 2010 - 11:32 PM
RB just needs to win this thing. I don't care who. They need to pull off a 1-2. Maybe Lewis will keep Alonso behind him? I dunno...too many variables
#54
Posted 08 November 2010 - 12:06 AM
assuming emo is in 3rd anyways.they need a 1-2 in a specific order depending on which driver wins...
#55
Posted 08 November 2010 - 12:30 AM
#56
Posted 08 November 2010 - 08:37 AM
Something else I've noticed this weekend. I think Webbo is a dick with all his #2 comments. Seb is certainly no angel, but it's pretty clear to me that Mark is just stirring the shit and trying to get some leverage within the team, even though he had equal opportunity so far this year. (Silverstone wing aside). Personally I don't think he can cope with the pressure.
Actually I've just thought that was very aussie of him (at least from my aussie friends). They like to bitch a lot, but at the end of the day they get on with the job at hand.
#57
Posted 08 November 2010 - 09:17 AM
#58
Posted 08 November 2010 - 04:04 PM
Ferrari is stronger at Abu Dahbi though...oh man, tough.
#60
Posted 08 November 2010 - 05:48 PM
seriously... this is going to be good...
I'm in for Lewis making a desperate charge on the inside of Alonso for the chip, only to hit him leaving the Red Bulls to duke it out
#61
Posted 09 November 2010 - 04:02 AM
I'm in for Lewis making a desperate charge on the inside of Alonso for the chip, only to hit him leaving the Red Bulls to duke it out
That's not a good idea by any means, coz that mean skittles will crash into webbo like in Turkey and hand Emo the 'chip.
It should be a 3 car pileup with Skittles, Emo and Hambone, Webbo wins , and I'll finally have something to cheer about this yr. But should that not happen, it's ok, I'm used to being left disappointed .
#62
Posted 09 November 2010 - 04:39 AM
#63
Posted 09 November 2010 - 04:42 AM
It's not really irony if Vettel decides to let him through out of his own accord. He clearly hasn't cut him a single break all year.Gaybo's only chance of victory is team orders, the irony will be awesome if skittle lets him through for the win.
#64
Posted 09 November 2010 - 05:34 AM
I'm sure Red Bull will make it very clear that they are only allowed to race each other for the title if Alonso is out of reach for the title...
#66
Posted 09 November 2010 - 06:05 AM
It's not really irony if Vettel decides to let him through out of his own accord. He clearly hasn't cut him a single break all year.
The irony will be from all the people who were gnashing their teeth after Germany rejoicing that somebody other than Fred won because of team orders.
That won't happen though, Fred's got this shit.
if Alonso wins this weekend he will pull alongside Jackie Stewart, who has 27 wins and 3 titles.
#67
Posted 09 November 2010 - 06:23 AM
Did you go to Brazil this year too? Damn man. How was it?
That's Montreal, I can't believe you don't recognize that kurb...
#68
Posted 09 November 2010 - 06:25 AM
Vettel letting Webbo through because his chances are over != not team orders. It's teamwork.The irony will be from all the people who were gnashing their teeth after Germany rejoicing that somebody other than Fred won because of team orders.
#69
Posted 09 November 2010 - 06:26 AM
I didn'tThat's Montreal, I can't believe you don't recognize that kurb...
#70
Posted 09 November 2010 - 06:28 AM
Vettel letting Webbo through because his chances are over != not team orders. It's teamwork.
I guess Ferrari discovered teamwork earlier than their competitors then.
#71
Posted 09 November 2010 - 06:33 AM
I'm not a huge anti-teamorders guy.I guess Ferrari discovered teamwork earlier than their competitors then.
BUT, Ferarri ordering Massa to move over on the anniversary of a horrible accident and Vettel letting his team mate by because his chances are over are two completely unrelated scenarios.
#72
Posted 09 November 2010 - 06:45 AM
#73
Posted 09 November 2010 - 09:17 AM
Actually I've just thought that was very aussie of him (at least from my aussie friends). They like to bitch a lot, but at the end of the day they get on with the job at hand.
Living in New Zealand I can confirm that Aussies are extremely whiny.
faggots
#74
Posted 09 November 2010 - 02:54 PM
Massa still technically had a chance to win the chip. He never got the oppurutunity to - and who knows, maybe with that win, it would've kick-started him to have become a contender the rest of the year? Look at Alonso's recovery. It's not entirely impossible.
Vettel letting Webber through makes sense because he would then mathematically be out of the hunt (assuming Alonso is in 3rd). What's the point of being a dick about it (in Vettel's position).
#75
Posted 09 November 2010 - 03:45 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users