If we had the old scoring system then Massa would be champion
#3
Posted 03 November 2008 - 04:27 PM
#4
Posted 03 November 2008 - 04:33 PM
#5
Posted 03 November 2008 - 04:41 PM
#6
Posted 03 November 2008 - 08:30 PM
#7
Posted 03 November 2008 - 08:34 PM
let's say they also got some unfavorable penalties during the season.. either way, the only thing that matters is that massa should have won the WDC had he not spun and beached in sepang, or the engine mcboom in the lead in hungary, or the pit light fuckup in singapore. but thats a moot point now, and hopefully they'll come back next year stronger than ever to clinch both titles again.People also forgetting the fact that Mclaren get a penalty and FIA go half-heartedly with it. If Mclaren were stuck at the end of the pits this wouldnt have been an exciting championship.
but yeah, the rule to end schumi dominance comes back to bite both him and his protoge in the ass. who says the FIA is only pro-ferrari
#8
Posted 03 November 2008 - 08:59 PM
It changed when Schumi was dominant, so that he wouldn't lock up the season so early on, IIRC.when was the points system change?? and how many other titles would have changed? there have been alot of close championships...
#9
Posted 03 November 2008 - 09:03 PM
If the Penalties Out Of Nowhereâ„¢ hadn't handed 7+ points to Massa, it wouldn't have been exciting either.People also forgetting the fact that Mclaren get a penalty and FIA go half-heartedly with it. If Mclaren were stuck at the end of the pits this wouldnt have been an exciting championship.
#10
Posted 03 November 2008 - 11:42 PM
let's say they also got some unfavorable penalties during the season.. either way, the only thing that matters is that massa should have won the WDC had he not spun and beached in sepang, or the engine mcboom in the lead in hungary, or the pit light fuckup in singapore. but thats a moot point now, and hopefully they'll come back next year stronger than ever to clinch both titles again.
but yeah, the rule to end schumi dominance comes back to bite both him and his protoge in the ass. who says the FIA is only pro-ferrari
so if it wasnt for an amateur driving error Massa would be champ? ifs and buts, just like kimi would be wdc in 05 if mclaren was more reliable lalalaa
I hate LH as much as the next guy. He's a twat, but cmon guys he won and massa only looked like he was worthy of a wdc on a few occasions (brazil being one of those).
Anyway roll on 2009
#12
Posted 04 November 2008 - 11:42 PM
If the Penalties Out Of Nowhereâ„¢ hadn't handed 7+ points to Massa, it wouldn't have been exciting either.
That's debatable. However, the pitlane musical chairs wasn't
#13
Posted 04 November 2008 - 11:56 PM
I guess i missed how pitlane position was such a huge deal.That's debatable. However, the pitlane musical chairs wasn't
#14
Posted 12 November 2008 - 06:10 PM
and it worked for one seasonIt changed when Schumi was dominant, so that he wouldn't lock up the season so early on, IIRC.
#15
Posted 13 November 2008 - 12:45 PM
"In the end one could argue that Ferrari lost the championship for Massa. He had the two engine failures in Australia and Hungary, the two pit problems in Canada and Singapore, and unfortunate tyre calls in Monaco and Britain.
If you attribute the Monza qualifying tyre choice to Lewis, then arguably the only time a McLaren error cost him points was in Malaysia, where there was a delay in the pits. The strategy call in Hockenheim was perhaps not ideal, but since he won, it didn't cost him. In terms of pure bad luck, you cannot discount the Budapest tyre problem.
So what of the drivers themselves? Massa went off in Malaysia, and he unnecessarily earned himself a penalty with what looked like a petulant shove of Lewis in Japan. Aside from the many spins in his nightmare race at Silverstone, he didn't do too much else wrong (his wild race in Australia was in any case spoiled by the engine failure).
Hamilton created his own dramas in Malaysia (the qualifying block), Bahrain (the grid and Alonso collisions), Canada, France, Belgium (the second lap spin rather than the overtaking move) and Japan, plus he made that qualifying tyre choice in Italy.
Of course Hamilton is a deserving world champion. But add up the points lost to team mistakes, and cross reference that with opportunities wasted by driver errors, and perhaps you may come to the conclusion that Massa deserved to win it just a little bit more..."
http://www.autosport...cle.php/id/1872
#16
Posted 13 November 2008 - 10:13 PM
#17
Posted 13 November 2008 - 10:46 PM
I think they were just making the point that Hammy made more mistakes than massa, but ferrari mgmt made the most costly mistakes.I don't think it's fair to discount all of Massa's beeching the car issues just because his engine failed when he was out of the points due to his own mistakes anyway.
Good article btw.
#18
Posted 13 November 2008 - 11:15 PM
I think they were just making the point that Hammy made more mistakes than massa, but ferrari mgmt made the most costly mistakes.
Good article btw.
But to discount driver mistakes totally due to the fact they coincided with mechanical failures afterward in a race puts a biased blame on the team.
#19
Posted 13 November 2008 - 11:16 PM
I don't think it's fair to discount all of Massa's beeching the car issues just because his engine failed when he was out of the points due to his own mistakes anyway.
i think australia and malaysia cannot be blamed on the team (i'll admit it took massa a few races to get on board with the lack of TC) but hungary, canada and singapore were huge blunders by the team on days when ferrari were looking good to score solid points over hamilton... looking at mclaren TEAM mistakes it seems like they all landed on heikki's plate and the mistakes that ham had throughout the season were down to his driving style and not team blunders.
either way, ham is WDC, ferrari is WCC. massa came in 2nd, was let down by stupid mistakes in the season... bring on '09!
#20
Posted 14 November 2008 - 02:07 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users