Jump to content

Nissan GT-R V-Spec laps the Nür...


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#26 yonson

yonson

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,172 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Motor city...
  • Interests:Too numerous to bore you with...

Posted 10 April 2008 - 03:38 AM

Nissan needs to get in F1.


FUCK yea! I'd be a Nissan sackrider for sure!

#27 HighTachPres

HighTachPres

    GP2

  • F1 Crew Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts
  • Location:Long Beach, CA
  • Interests:fast cars and fast girls

Posted 10 April 2008 - 05:02 AM

the GT-R has a gang of virgin asian tech geniuses behind it


:o :o :eek3:

#28 HighTachPres

HighTachPres

    GP2

  • F1 Crew Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts
  • Location:Long Beach, CA
  • Interests:fast cars and fast girls

Posted 10 April 2008 - 05:03 AM

this is true... although they are technical wonders, i really want a car like an S2k or an elise. something i can feel while im driving. ya know?? when i tell most "car guys" my favorite car is the S2k, they look at me like :o and then usually say something about no torque, only 240 hp, or its not good for drifting. and then i know not to talk to them about cars anymore :o


race em in the yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaris!

#29 _R_

_R_

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,835 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 April 2008 - 05:19 AM

FUCK yea! I'd be a Nissan sackrider for sure!


*cough*renault*cough*

#30 chiuey

chiuey

    Formula 1

  • F1 Crew Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,176 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Taipei, Taiwan
  • Interests:Cycling, Running, Wakeboarding & Karts

Posted 10 April 2008 - 05:31 AM

:o

#31 yonson

yonson

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,172 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Motor city...
  • Interests:Too numerous to bore you with...

Posted 10 April 2008 - 05:58 AM

*cough*renault*cough*


meh

I mean REAL Nissan!

#32 mads

mads

    Formula 1

  • F1 Crew Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,251 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:CANADA

Posted 10 April 2008 - 06:58 AM

nissan enters f1 in 2009 with GTR-Vspec II Nur Type-S A-spec TTi Vtec VR6TT :o

#33 rlolz

rlolz

    Formula Ford

  • F1 Crew Member
  • Pip
  • 72 posts

Posted 11 April 2008 - 01:47 AM

this is true... although they are technical wonders, i really want a car like an S2k or an elise. something i can feel while im driving. ya know?? when i tell most "car guys" my favorite car is the S2k, they look at me like :noes: and then usually say something about no torque, only 240 hp, or its not good for drifting. and then i know not to talk to them about cars anymore :p

drifting :noes:

#34 yonson

yonson

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,172 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Motor city...
  • Interests:Too numerous to bore you with...

Posted 11 April 2008 - 03:34 AM

drifting :noes:


And just what is so bad about d0rift0ing y0!



:p

#35 _R_

_R_

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,835 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 April 2008 - 05:48 AM

Leading up to the official reveal of the Corvette ZR-1, a rare week went by when we didn't see spy shots of the General's new super coupe eating up the Nurburgring. But still images don't tell the whole tale, so InsideLine sent its spies to the North Loop with a video camera to capture an uncloaked ZR-1 making the rounds on the 'Ring. According to the men behind the lens, they were able to clock the 620 hp, supercharged 'Vette running laps "in the low 7:40s," easily within reach of supercars costing substantially more than the ZR-1's estimated $100k price tag. But what about the elephant on the 'Ring in the room? The Nissan GT-R V-Spec.

As reported earlier this week, spies caught the GT-R V-Spec lapping the Nordschleife, and with stopwatches at the ready, they were able to time Godzilla's lightweight (by an estimated 330 pounds), more powerful (70 hp or so) sibling at an unbelievable 7:25 per lap. According to the crew that crudely timed the ZR-1, the track was damp, so that 7:40 time could easily be improved by at least four or five seconds. But that's still a long way off.


oh snap :werd:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users