![:mamoru:](http://forums.f1-crew.com/public/style_emoticons/default/eek3.gif)
http://www.autoblog....stun-observers/
i gotta say i wasnt that big a fan of the R35 GT-R, but this sort of performance commands respect...
Posted 09 April 2008 - 01:44 AM
Posted 09 April 2008 - 01:49 AM
Posted 09 April 2008 - 01:52 AM
I want to see some videos, R35 on the ring and the Carrera GT on the ring.
Posted 09 April 2008 - 02:00 AM
Posted 09 April 2008 - 02:50 AM
they are, under the renault brand.
Posted 09 April 2008 - 05:51 AM
Posted 09 April 2008 - 07:54 AM
they are, under the renault brand.
Posted 09 April 2008 - 07:54 AM
13 seconds faster than the GTR... on it's first time out
and it's still in testing....
holy shit jesus fuck
Posted 09 April 2008 - 09:00 AM
Well the regular GT-R is rated at 480hp, which Dynos have already shown it to be underrated, so the consensus is that the actual HP rating is around 520-530. So add the 70hp of the V-spec, subtract 330 pounds, add better aerodynamics and better brakes and whatever else and the result should be a white substance in your pants.I'm gonna be the first and say BS
Posted 09 April 2008 - 01:15 PM
Well the regular GT-R is rated at 480hp, which Dynos have already shown it to be underrated, so the consensus is that the actual HP rating is around 520-530. So add the 70hp of the V-spec, subtract 330 pounds, add better aerodynamics and better brakes and whatever else and the result should be a white substance in your pants.
Posted 10 April 2008 - 01:26 AM
Well the regular GT-R is rated at 480hp, which Dynos have already shown it to be underrated, so the consensus is that the actual HP rating is around 520-530. So add the 70hp of the V-spec, subtract 330 pounds, add better aerodynamics and better brakes and whatever else and the result should be a white substance in your pants.
Posted 10 April 2008 - 01:30 AM
Posted 10 April 2008 - 01:50 AM
The Zonda and CGT both have manual trannies and RWD, the GT-R has a gang of virgin asian tech geniuses behind it,. 3 seconds faster over a 7.25 minute lap isn't all that much. As far as the 330 pounds, the regular GT-R is nearly 4000lbs, so it's not that far fetched. The CGT is only 3045 lbs. It's all very nutty.330 pounds weight saving from a car? I dont think Ive heard of a roadcar shedding so much weight. a Porsche 997 Cup car is only about 350 pounds lighter than a road GT3 and its a stripped out race car with all carbon panels. 330 pounds is wishful thinking. But I can understand the car having 600bhp reliably but that still brings it back to Carrera GT (below Zonda F)bhp and its still 200-300kg more
Posted 10 April 2008 - 02:14 AM
The Zonda and CGT both have manual trannies and RWD, the GT-R has a gang of virgin asian tech geniuses behind it,. 3 seconds faster over a 7.25 minute lap isn't all that much. As far as the 330 pounds, the regular GT-R is nearly 4000lbs, so it's not that far fetched. The CGT is only 3045 lbs. It's all very nutty.
Posted 10 April 2008 - 02:17 AM
Posted 10 April 2008 - 03:37 AM
Like a Corvette, even though it's fast (and cheap), it doesn't really do anything for me.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users