IPB Skin by CGN

Jump to content

  2. →
  3. →

Vote....was this bullshit?

Started by DrDickAction , Sep 08 2008 01:20 AM

  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

Poll: Vote....was this bullshit? (30 member(s) have cast votes)

Did lewis cheat?

  1. Fk this shit, Lewis won fair and square (8 votes [26.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 26.67%

  2. Lewis pushed the rules, and should have been penalized, but maybe not quite as much as this (15 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  3. Lewis is a cheating cock sucking faggot who probably makes Nicole Scherzinger wear his helmet in bed so he can make love to himself (7 votes [23.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 DrDickAction

DrDickAction

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,867 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oakland, CA

Posted 08 September 2008 - 01:20 AM

well...

#2 Dr. Jimmmah!

Dr. Jimmmah!

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,024 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Jose, CA
  • Interests:Motorsports

Posted 08 September 2008 - 01:28 AM

option d)

lewis maybe got an advantage by the straightlining of the chicane, but that wasnt enough to warrant the penalty. tack on that he was doing some dangerous blocking after eau rouge and it adds up to a penalty.

#3 Nacho

Nacho

    WDC

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,924 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 September 2008 - 01:51 AM

option d)

lewis maybe got an advantage by the straightlining of the chicane, but that wasnt enough to warrant the penalty. tack on that he was doing some dangerous blocking after eau rouge and it adds up to a penalty.

It looks more like you went for:
Option E) Justifying the penalty for the FIA to help bring them one step closer to their ultimate goal of eliminating actual racing in F1 and just handing Ferrari titles every year.

#4 vietlol

vietlol

    WDC

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,389 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:09 AM

I voted for third because of description but think two is more appropriate

#5 vietlol

vietlol

    WDC

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,389 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:10 AM

It looks more like you went for:
Option E) Justifying the penalty for the FIA to help bring them one step closer to their ultimate goal of eliminating actual racing in F1 and just handing Ferrari titles every year.


Posted Image

#6 _R_

_R_

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,840 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:17 AM

rules were broken, agreed...
punishment was a tad much... give him like a 5 place grid penalty or something...

kimi and lewis was pushing each other, giving us one of the best battles of the season so far, and this is how the FIA managed to ruin it...

#7 Nacho

Nacho

    WDC

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,924 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:20 AM

Charlie Whiting, the FIA Race Director, believes Lewis Hamilton should not be penalised for his battle with Kimi Raikkonen at the thrilling end of the Belgian Grand Prix, according to McLaren chief Ron Dennis.


http://en.f1-live.co...907180059.shtml

#8 Nacho

Nacho

    WDC

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,924 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:21 AM

Posted Image

Neat. That's not an incident even remotely mentioned in the penalty statement.

Thanks for playing.

How anyone can be happy about a penalty after the fact stripping a race win from anyone who just got done with that bit of driving (from both Kimi and Hamilton) is beyond me. You want to reward people who putt around the track like Massa? "Race car drivers" that never take any risks on a wheel-wheel fight?

#9 yonson

yonson

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,172 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Motor city...
  • Interests:Too numerous to bore you with...

Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:21 AM

rules were broken, agreed...
punishment was a tad much... give him like a 5 place grid penalty or something...

kimi and lewis was pushing each other, giving us one of the best battles of the season so far, and this is how the FIA managed to ruin it...


:werd:

#10 Shi

Shi

    Administrator

  • F1 Crew Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,777 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Gatos, CA
  • Interests:Vehicle dynamics, trackdays, motorsports

Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:35 AM

option d)

lewis maybe got an advantage by the straightlining of the chicane, but that wasnt enough to warrant the penalty. tack on that he was doing some dangerous blocking after eau rouge and it adds up to a penalty.

.

#11 Alicante

Alicante

    GP2

  • F1 Crew Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 386 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Miami Beach, FL
  • Interests:Suck my fucking balls mclaren

Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:39 AM

:werd:

#12 vietlol

vietlol

    WDC

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,389 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:51 AM

Neat. That's not an incident even remotely mentioned in the penalty statement.

Thanks for playing.

How anyone can be happy about a penalty after the fact stripping a race win from anyone who just got done with that bit of driving (from both Kimi and Hamilton) is beyond me. You want to reward people who putt around the track like Massa? "Race car drivers" that never take any risks on a wheel-wheel fight?


this is what followed, anyway I think massa raced just fine in hungary taking risks and passing at the start, but you can bang wheels without breaking rules xD

#13 Nacho

Nacho

    WDC

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,924 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:52 AM

this is what followed, anyway I think massa raced just fine in hungary taking risks and passing at the start, but you can bang wheels without breaking rules xD

Only if you're in a red car. :werd:

#14 DrDickAction

DrDickAction

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,867 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oakland, CA

Posted 08 September 2008 - 03:28 AM

rules were broken, agreed...
punishment was a tad much... give him like a 5 place grid penalty or something...

kimi and lewis was pushing each other, giving us one of the best battles of the season so far, and this is how the FIA managed to ruin it...

This is really what I think...10 grid penalty at monza would've been a lot more appropriate...and subtle.

#15 mads

mads

    Formula 1

  • F1 Crew Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,251 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:CANADA

Posted 08 September 2008 - 04:18 AM

This is really what I think...10 grid penalty at monza would've been a lot more appropriate...and subtle.

thats what i thought...assigning a drive through 3 hours after the race is just bullshit.

#16 chiuey

chiuey

    Formula 1

  • F1 Crew Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,176 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Taipei, Taiwan
  • Interests:Cycling, Running, Wakeboarding & Karts

Posted 08 September 2008 - 04:30 AM

option d)

lewis maybe got an advantage by the straightlining of the chicane, but that wasn't enough to warrant the penalty. tack on that he was doing some dangerous blocking after eau rouge and it adds up to a penalty.


but if cutting the chicane wasn't enough to warrant the penalty, then the stewards should be specific about the dangerous blocking instead. but they did deem the drive thru due to cutting the chicane not dangerous blocking so the stewards are wrong in this case.

And in th case for dangerous blocking, what ever the fine is for the offence, whether it's 25 sec or 10 grid places in the next race, it should be applied to both Lewis and Kimi as they both did multiple-direction blocking moves on each other.

#17 doublemeat

doublemeat

    Formula 3

  • F1 Crew Member
  • PipPip
  • 177 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Antonio, Texas

Posted 08 September 2008 - 04:41 AM

Is he dating Nicole Scherzinger?

#18 DrDickAction

DrDickAction

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,867 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oakland, CA

Posted 08 September 2008 - 05:19 AM

yep...:werd:....she's ruined now:

http://www.sfgate.co...;entry_id=29937

Posted Image

#19 DrDickAction

DrDickAction

    F1 Legend

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,867 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oakland, CA

Posted 08 September 2008 - 05:20 AM

I voted for third because of description but think two is more appropriate

:werd: :rofl:

#20 Nacho

Nacho

    WDC

  • F1 Crew Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,924 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 September 2008 - 05:26 AM

but if cutting the chicane wasn't enough to warrant the penalty, then the stewards should be specific about the dangerous blocking instead. but they did deem the drive thru due to cutting the chicane not dangerous blocking so the stewards are wrong in this case.

And in th case for dangerous blocking, what ever the fine is for the offence, whether it's 25 sec or 10 grid places in the next race, it should be applied to both Lewis and Kimi as they both did multiple-direction blocking moves on each other.

IBnewPenaltyForDangerousBlockingAnd25secAddedToKimiAndHammy.....


:werd:

#21 chiuey

chiuey

    Formula 1

  • F1 Crew Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,176 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Taipei, Taiwan
  • Interests:Cycling, Running, Wakeboarding & Karts

Posted 08 September 2008 - 05:40 AM

yep...:werd:....she's ruined now:

http://www.sfgate.co...;entry_id=29937

Posted Image


kim kardashian is hotter

#22 MrHahn

MrHahn

    Formula 1

  • F1 Crew Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,013 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Austraya

Posted 08 September 2008 - 08:36 AM

I think the penalty was justified to an extent. If Kimi had stayed in the race, it would have been completely justified.

#23 mads

mads

    Formula 1

  • F1 Crew Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,251 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:CANADA

Posted 08 September 2008 - 08:41 AM

I think the penalty was justified to an extent. If Kimi had stayed in the race, it would have been completely justified.

:werd:

#24 MrHahn

MrHahn

    Formula 1

  • F1 Crew Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,013 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Austraya

Posted 08 September 2008 - 09:45 AM

:werd:


and if Kimi had stayed in the race I might still be second in PFF1. Nigga better consult me next time he thinks about going dorifto in his F1 car

#25 Skyliner

Skyliner

    Formula 1

  • F1 Crew Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,025 posts
  • Location:NC

Posted 08 September 2008 - 09:50 AM

It looks more like you went for:
Option E) Justifying the penalty for the FIA to help bring them one step closer to their ultimate goal of eliminating actual racing in F1 and just handing Ferrari titles every year.

Besides both owning MR2's, we never agree about anything. :rofl:

Which one of us is the evil twin? :werd: :rofl:
Back to F1 Crew chat


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users